|
Title: |
How can we support educators
to develop skills and understandings inclusionally? |
|
Authors &
affiliations: |
Chris Jones and Marie
Huxtable Bath and North East Somerset
Local Authority |
|
Abstract: |
Relevance of study or
enquiry (to BERA members) The need to develop processes and procedures that enable
us to move between research, practice and policy in a meaningful way has been
clearly identified by Furlong and Oancea. (2005). Practitioner based research, inclusion and
emotional literacy are key concerns for educators in schools and local
authorities as can be seen from the recent strategies and directives
emanating from the DFES. Through our work to develop and implement the Local
Authority's EDP (Education Development Plan) strand on Action Research
Project – learners and learning, we have moved from understanding these
as discrete activities with points of connection to distinct facets of
developing an inclusional, educational culture. Focus of enquiry; In leading on the EDP
Action Research strand we have been working 'to build the capacity of schools
regarding inclusive practice through Action Research'. We have sought to do this by working within our
sphere of influence with our colleagues in the education authority and
educators in schools and in collaboration with Jack Whitehead at the
University of Bath. Appropriateness of
methods; Because we are engaged in a self-study of knowledge-creation
in the process of researching my~our educational influences in my~our
professional practice, a living theory approach to action research appears
appropriate as the form of research in which the individual practitioner
generates explanations for their educational influences in their own
learning, in the learning of others and in the learning of social formations
(Whitehead, 2005). The action research approach used in the enquiry will
follow the model of Thinking Actively in a Social Context (TASC), developed
by Wallace (Chandler & Wallace, 2004) Robustness of analytical
or theoretical framework; The robustness of the theoretical frameworks of living
educational theories can be judged from their genesis (Whitehead, 1989) to
their global spread (Whitehead, 2006) in processes of enquiry that are
withstanding evaluations of validity and legitimacy in a range of communities
of educational researchers in Britain, China, Japan, Canada, South Africa,
the USA, Australia and Singapore.
Significance for
educational policy and/or practice. The significance is focused
on our developing understanding of inclusionality (Rayner) in transformatory
education, the nature of the standards of judgement for practice-based
educational research (Furlong and Oancea, 2005) and the academic legitimacy
of individual's creating their living educational theories from collaborative
enquiries of the kind, 'How do I improve what I am doing?' (Whitehead, 1989). |